jump to navigation

Greedy Bastards May 18, 2009

Posted by Kate Ryan in Economy, George Will, Greed, National Politics, Politics.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche in 1983's "Trading Places"
Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche in 1983’s “Trading Places”

In the 1983 comedy classic “Trading Places”, brothers Randolph and Mortimer Duke (Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche) make a bet that affects the lives of con man Billy Ray Valentine (Eddie Murphy) and blue-blooded investment counselor Louis Winthorpe III (Dan Ackroyd).  In a famous exchange from the film, the brothers are discussing their attempts to corner the frozen orange juice market:

Randolph Duke: Money isn’t everything, Mortimer.
Mortimer Duke: Oh, grow up.
Randolph Duke: Mother always said you were greedy.
Mortimer Duke: She meant it as a compliment

I thought of the Dukes this morning when I opened the local paper to see a piece by my “favorite” Conservative columnist, George Will.  Headlined, “Greed’s Saving Graces”, Will’s article snarkily chastises those of us who are laying the blame for the current financial crisis at the feet of the wealthy class in America.  In his best Gordon Gekko imitation, Will pontificates, “…everyone knows we are in our current economic pickle because greed, which slept through the Clinton administration, was awakened by the Bush administration’s tax cuts and deregulation.”

O.K., George, you got me there.  There were greedy people during the Clinton administration.  I agree with Will’s impatience at partisan shame when he says, “Greed grows when Republicans hold the presidency.”    Truly, greed is sort of the human condition – there are few of us that have lived our lives unaffected by it.   But even George Will can not explain the destruction of the American middle class, growing wealth inequity, and rising economic hardship (since the “Reagan Revolution”) by mere market forces alone. 

Will states that we find it difficult to define greed, but like pornography, we know it when we see it.  He explains that our common definition is, “That person is greedy who earns, or wants to earn, more than is seemly.” 

Like all Conservatives – especially the hoity-toity ones like himself - Will believes that we great unwashed just envy those hard-working rich people.  So we satisfy ourselves and explain away our inability to create wealth as the other man’s greed.   If we were smart like him, we would realize that “…when markets are allowed to operate, greed generates its own punishment.”  To prove his point, Will uses an example from an economist that studied ticket sales on Stubhub, an internet site for ticket-scalping.  The economist found that “deregulated markets punished greed”, in that prices to tickets went down as a large supply of them remained as an event drew near.  Any seller intent on gouging a customer on his asking price had to lower it or be left holding the bag on an unsold ticket.  Ergo, says Will, a greedy seller is punished by having to lower the price for his tickets.

The Stubhub story is an example of perfect supply and demand economics, and it could be said that the marketplace here controlled greed, but is it a true analogy to the meltdown of the world economy?  Not exactly. 

Stubhub is a near-perfect capitalist marketplace.  Individual sellers market their product at a price they’ve set based upon the demand for the product, the supply available, and the quality of that supply.  Sellers generally do not collude prices with other sellers.  Every buyer coming into the site is free to comparison shop and decide what – if anything – suits his needs.  Buyers are also free to try to obtain their product by other means.  This way, the marketplace does control price – and can tamp down price gouging and greed.

This is not the way, however, that the world marketplace actually works these days.  Take the credit card industry for example.  A consumer is generally not free to not have a credit card.  The ability to produce a credit card for a whole host of products or services is the only way to get things done.  The issuing companies, however, do not have to follow any type of contract they signed with you.  They can change your interest rate, apply it to your entire balance (not just new purchases), double or triple your minimum payment, and charge exorbitant fees for any or no reason at all.  The only real “competition” among credit card issuers is the tease they use to get you to sign up with them.  How is this an example of a free market?  These banks – that are borrowing money at less than 1% – are charging customers 29.9% interest for being late on their electric bills.  Sorry, George, that’s greed.

As defined by Webster’s, greed is “an excessive desire to acquire or possess more than what one needs or deserves, especially with respect to material wealth.”  Excessive. 

I have nothing against rich people – I would sincerely love to be a rich person some day – but greed is a danger of wealth.  It is when you can buy everything you need and everything you want, but you still want more.  Greed is marked by excess.  It is the idea that you charge excessive fees, you cut corners to make excessive profits, you pay your executives excessive bonuses – because you can; because there is nothing there to check you – like regulation. 

Greed has no saving graces.  It is a lust that can never be satisfied.  As the ancient Roman poet Horace said,  ”He who is greedy is always in want.”

Rush to Judgement May 12, 2009

Posted by Kate Ryan in Economy, National Politics, Racism, Rush Limbaugh.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

rush_limbaugh_350_31Count me as one person who took a sharp intake of breath and uttered an “uh-oh” when Wanda Sykes skewered Rush Limbaugh at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner on Saturday.   I absolutely knew what a shitstorm of controversy would rain down over her comments – even though I personally share them.  Not only Republican moderates give Rush a wide berth – so do may of us liberals.  The man is a menace – and dangerous.

Limbaugh is dangerous because the audience he panders to is simmering with rage these days.  Under-educated and under-employed white males with guns.  These are scary people, even in the best of times.  In uncertain times like we’re in now, they have become terrifying.  The Department of Homeland Security took a lot of heat for saying that individuals like that bear scrutiny, but remember, until 9-11, the greatest terrorist attack committed on American soil was perpetrated by an under-educated and under-employed white guy with guns and a grudge.

Limbaugh is very successful at what he does.  He throws red meat to this reactionary and religious base and whips them into a frenzy that will consume everything in its path.  So far this year, he has publicly humiliated and disgraced several moderate Republicans, including Michael Steele, Chairman of his own party.  The latest to be thrown under the Limbaugh bus is former Secretary of State General Colin Powell.  No matter how badly Powell was used by the Bush administration, he is an honorable person; a person who spent 30 years of his life wearing the uniform of the United States and sworn to protect us.  The only stain on his otherwise stellar career is the Bush Administration orchestrated speech before the U.N. with manufactured intelligence.  Rush has rather forcefully demanded that Powell leave the Republican party – a position supported by the Prince of Darkness himself, former V.P. Dick Cheney.  Both Limbaugh and Cheney have used thinly-veiled racist propaganda to prove their points; Powell endorsed Obama for President because they are both black and Democrats.

Limbaugh is no stranger to racism.  His career as a football commentator was cut short for saying that Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb was held to a different (read – lower) performance standard because he was black.  He dismissed General Powell’s endorsement of Obama because he is black.  He gleefully played a recording of “Barack the Magic Negro” over and over on his radio show.  The latest nugget of Rush racism came yesterday on his radio show.

According to Limbaugh, President Obama wants unemployment.  According to Rush, more unemployment means more welfare benefits, and food stamps, and the expansion of the welfare state.  Then, in a stunningly racist comment says, “And the objective is to take the nation’s wealth and return to it to the nation’s quote, “rightful owners.” Think reparations. Think forced reparations here if you want to understand what actually is going on.”

My inclination as a liberal is to just ignore this crazy, right-wing gas-bag, but I just can’t anymore.  Limbaugh is creating a festering climate for those “American History X” skinheads that make up his listening public.  I am joining the boycott against Limbaugh’s advertisers.  We must all take a stand and finally neutralize this threat if we hope to see our country succeed.

Please see Blog Me No Blogs for a good listing of Limbaugh’s advertisers.