jump to navigation

Bearing False Witness August 13, 2009

Posted by Kate Ryan in Christian Right, Chuck Grassley, Health Care, Politics, Republicans, Right-Wing Extremism.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Prosperity PreacherI have said before on these pages that I was raised as a Roman Catholic.  Though I now consider myself to be an agnostic, I still remember what all those years of religious instruction taught me; feed the hungry, clothe the naked, love thy neighbor, forgive the sinners, and heal the sick. 

One doesn’t need religion – or even to believe in God – to follow these principles in life.  What amazes me are those people that hold themselves out as Christians that  seem to forget those teachings.

Senator Chuck Grassley (R - IA) is one of those baffling “Christians”.  A member of the ultra-conservative religious organization,  the “Family” – lately in the news for their members’ sexual peccadilloes – Grassley serves on the powerful Senate Finance committee, currently and supposedly working on a “bi-partisan” health care reform bill.   I say “supposedly”  because Grassley has continually drawn lines in the sand regarding the centerpiece of any reform legislation – the public option.  Could it be because he has taken over $2.5 million from the various health care lobbies?

Though Grassley’s corporate opposition has had me angry for weeks now, I at least appreciated that the man had a real ideological difference with my view (even though it seems to be bought and paid for).  Everyone knew that health care reform would be a real fight – we shouldn’t have expected anything else.  What I never anticipated, however, was the outright lies and scare tactics the right wing is using to cloud the debate.  The latest, and most outrageous, is the assertion that the advance directive counseling provisions in the House bill are there to euthanize senior citizens. 

Grassley was quick to denounce this lie when Sarah Palin wrote on Facebook that the plan would force her parents or handicapped son to stand in front of a “death panel” to determine if their lives were worth preserving.  Then yesterday, at a town hall meeting in Iowa, Grassley told his constituents that they had “every right to fear”  and that “We should not have a government program that determines if you’re going to pull the plug on grandma.”  The day after President Obama cited Grassley as a person “working hard for bi-partisanship”, Grassley sticks the knife in his back.  What dishonorable behavior.

Joan Walsh said at Salon.com today, “It’s wonderful that Medicare would pay for such consultations for people without the means to do it earlier under most plans Obama supports. And it’s beyond cruel and shameful that a service meant to empower a low- to middle-income Grandma or Grandpa who didn’t make prior plans is now being depicted as pulling the plug on her, or him. Grassley and his elitist buddies, liberal or conservative, should be deeply ashamed.”

Ashamed is right.  And the rest of us that believe that he should be need to get off our collective asses and do something about it.  First, call the White House to tell the President that it’s time to forget bipartisanship and cut these Republicans loose.  Use reconciliation if necessary, but get health care reform with a public option passed ASAP.  Then, write a letter to Senator Harry Reid and tell him to get off his chicken ass and begin censure proceedings against Grassley.  Copy and paste text is included below.  Finally, get in touch with Grassely’s 2010 Democratic opponent Bob Krause – who supports a public option in reform – and give him whatever support you can – even if it’s just words of support. 

Republicans love to quote the 10 Commandments.  They want them posted in courthouses, legislative chambers, and public schools.   Maybe they should remember the ninth commandment – Thou shall not bear false witness.  Bearing false witness, Mr. Grassley,  Christian Conservative, means lying.  Last I checked, you could go to hell for that.

CUT AND PASTE TEXT TO E-MAIL TO HARRY REID:

Dear Senator Reid:

   I am writing today to demand that, as leader of the U.S. Senate majority, you bring censure proceedings against Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa.  Yesterday, Senator Grassley told an audience at a town hall meeting in Iowa that the House health care reform bill will “pull the plug on Grandma”.  For a United States Senator to repeat such an obvious and horrible lie in a public meeting is beyond all reason.  It is a dishonorable act that brings shame on the entire U.S. Senate.

   There is too much at stake here to allow these lies to be placed before the public as facts.  The only reason any of these are being repeated is to frighten and confuse some of our most vulnerable citizens – our seniors.

   Censure is the only option this Senate has.

Stimulate Me February 7, 2009

Posted by Kate Ryan in Barack Obama, Democrats, Economic Stimulus, National Politics, Republicans, US Senate.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
2 comments

us_economyThe economic stimulus negotiations winding their way through the Senate this week apparently reached a compromise last night.  According to news reports, “Traitor Joe” Lieberman joined forces with Susan Collins and Arlen Spector to strip over $100 billion in spending from the bill and bulk up on the Republican favored tax cuts.  Can you tell me again who won the election?  Because from where I’m sitting, it certainly doesn’t look like it was the Democrats.  Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, said that the “bill wasn’t perfect”, but it was an effective compromise.  For whom?  Not for the unemployed, or people who lost their health insurance, or homeowners in foreclosure, or schoolchildren, or any of the 47 states that are operating at huge deficits and need infusions of federal cash.

President Obama and the Democratic party have allowed – no invited – the minority Republicans to define this debate.  All the news shows have Republican “leaders” on the tube sanctimoniously saying that the Democratic-favored package is “just a spending bill”.  Well, duh!  By it’s very definition, stimulus IS spending.  The government has to inject cash into the economy to get it moving again and you don’t do that by providing tax cuts to businesses.  For every dollar the government gives up in tax cuts to businesses, it only gets back – at the most – 37 cents.  See the chart below:

courtesy Media Matters

courtesy Media Matters

Mediamatters.org published this chart on Friday as part of their story on how the news pundits are perpetuating this myth that the spending in the bill is “welfare”.   The chart was devised by John Zandi of Moody’s – a former economic adviser to John McCain.  

All this negative coverage and Republican spin has all the “Joe the Plumbers” out there gobbling this with a spoon.  Public support for the stimulus has dropped to 58%.  Meanwhile, the unemployment rate jumped to 7.6% yesterday and more job losses line the horizon.  It seems as though we WILL get fooled again.

I say Congress just scraps everything but infrastructure and industrial spending out of the bill.  Then, instead of tax cuts, the government should give direct stimulus to the people.  Every person in America would be able to apply for a grant to pay off 50% to 100% of either their mortgage debt or their consumer debt.  You could submit your total debt as of December 31, 2008 and the government would pay it off on a sliding scale depending upon your 2008 AGI – phasing the grants out after $175,000.  People that are unemployed or in foreclosure would be paid first and get the max.  For example, if you are unemployed and don’t own a home, but you have $10,000 in credit card debt, the government would pay it all and give you a clean slate.  If you make $150,000 and have a $300,000 mortgage, the government would pay $150,000 off and help you renegotiate the remaining balance at a lower rate. 

How would this help?  For the unemployed guy, if he doesn’t have to use his money to pay off consumer debt, he can concentrate on making sure his rent and utilities are paid, feed his kids, and continue his health insurance.  For the person with the mortgage that is strangling him because home values have declined, it takes away 50% of the bad debt – making the value more in line with market.  In both cases, lenders get their money back and that will stabilize them.  It also makes borrowers more credit-worthy, so they may start lending again (with tightened requirements – no more no documentation loans).  It’s a win-win, in my book.

Anything is better than another tax cut.